Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 67(5): e453-e471, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244706

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The death of a child may be the most traumatic event a family can experience. Bereavement care for parents is essential for their physical and mental well-being and is a psychosocial standard of care. Childhood mortality is higher in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs); however, little is known regarding bereavement support or interventions for parents in LMICs. AIM: To identify programs, services, initiatives, or interventions offered to bereaved parents in LMICs in hospital settings. METHODS: A systematic search was executed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles from LMICs describing interventions, programs, or resources provided to parents after the death of a child (0-18 years old) from any cause were included. Extracted data was categorized by demographics, study design, outcomes, and quality assessment using the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: We retrieved 4428 papers and screened their titles and abstracts, 36 articles were selected for full-text assessment, resulting in nine articles included in the final analysis. Most interventions described support for parents whose child died during the prenatal or neonatal period. The primary interventions included psychological counseling, creating mementos (such as photographs or footprints), and bereavement workshops. Only one paper described a fully established bereavement program for parents. Eight of the papers met high-quality criteria. DISCUSSION: Although bereavement care is crucial for parents whose child has died, only a few studies have documented bereavement interventions in LMICs. More research may help with bereavement program implementation and improved care for bereaved parents in LMICs.


Assuntos
Luto , Países em Desenvolvimento , Criança , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Apoio Social , Pesar , Pais/psicologia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38223237

RESUMO

Background: Palliative care (PC) is an integral part of cancer treatment. However, data on service availability is limited in childhood cancers. Aim: To describe the availability of PC services in paediatric oncology centres across Europe, and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing and providing paediatric palliative care (PPC). Methods: Paediatric oncology centres across Europe were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Results: A total of 158 paediatric oncology centres from 27 European countries participated. More than half of the centres (n=102, 64.6%) reported offering specialised PPC (defined as 24/7 coverage services with specialized physician and a multidisciplinary team). Most centres included a multidisciplinary care team (n=123, 80.9%) and PC at home (n=105, 69.1%). In 38.7% centres, service capacity was reported to be lower than demand. In most centres, PC consultation was initiated for a refractory neoplasm (n=126, 81.2%). Few centres (n=11, 7.1%) offered PC consultation at the time of a new cancer diagnosis. Eighty-two centres (52.6%) reported having bereavement services. Negative parental perception (n=99, 64.7%) and late referrals (n=91, 59.5%) were major barriers to implementation perceived by health care providers. Conclusion: Our results suggest that specialised PPC is available in more than half of paediatric oncology settings across Europe. Although half have had PPC available for >10 years, many cannot fulfil the demand for service. Barriers to implementation (i.e., parental education, staff training) should be addressed, with resources and services further expanded to cover the demand for PPC, including bereavement care.

3.
Rev. colomb. cir ; 34(4): 354-363, 20190000. tab, fig
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1049203

RESUMO

Introducción. La apendicitis aguda es causa frecuente de infección intraabdominal en pediatría. La elección del antibiótico se basa en los hallazgos quirúrgicos macroscópicos, el criterio médico, las guías locales o internacionales y, en pocas ocasiones, en el resultado de los aislamientos bacterianos en cultivos de líquido peritoneal y las tasas locales de resistencia. Se analizaron la frecuencia y la sensibilidad microbiológica de los cultivos de muestras de líquido peritoneal de pacientes de un mes a 16 años de edad con manejo quirúrgico por abdomen agudo con sospecha de infección intraabdominal.Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo de cohorte con análisis de las historias clínicas y de resultados de laboratorio de niños sometidos a cirugía por abdomen agudo, en la que el cirujano tomó muestra del líquido peritoneal para la tipificación y determinación de los perfiles de sensibilidad de los microorganismos aislados. Los datos se analizaron con el programa Stata™, versión 15.0.Resultados. Se identificaron 303 casos, de los cuales el 93,6 % recibió profilaxis antibiótica con ampicilina-sulbactam y clindamicina-amikacina. El 95,3 % de los procedimientos fueron apendicectomías. Se tomó cultivo del 50 % de las apendicitis perforadas. Se aislaron 48 microorganismos; el más frecuente (2,7 %) fue Escherichia coli positiva para BLEE. El 100 % de los microorganismos resultaron ser sensibles a la amikacina, el 97,2 % al merope-nem, y el 94,4 %, a la ciprofloxacina, el cefepime y el ceftazidime. La resistencia más frecuente (37,1 %) fue contra la combinación de ampicilina y sulbactam, en los gérmenes Gram negativos. Discusión. La evaluación de la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de los aislamientos de líquido peritoneal de los procedimientos quirúrgicos en pediatría, es una buena práctica clínica que orienta al cirujano en la adecuada selección del esquema antibiótico y, además, disminuye el riesgo de falla terapéutica temprana y la posibilidad de mayor resistencia o complicaciones infecciosas (AU)


Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a cause of intra-abdominal infection in pediatrics. The choice of antibiotic is based on the macroscopic surgical findings, the medical criteria, the local guidelines and the result of the bacterial isolation in the peritoneal fluid and the local resistance rate. We aim to analyze the frequency and microbiological susceptibility in cultures performed in peritoneal fluid samples in patients from 1 month to 16 years with surgical management of acute abdomen with suspected intra-abdominal infection.Materials and Methods: Prospective cohort study with analysis of clinical histories and laboratories in children taken to surgery for acute abdomen where the surgeon took a sample of peritoneal fluid for typing and determine susceptibility profiles of isolated microorganisms. Data analyzed with Stata V.15.0.Results: We identified 303 cases of which 93.6% received antibiotic prophylaxis with ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin-amikacin. 95.3% of the procedures were appendectomies. Cultivation was taken in 50% of perforated appendicitis. Isolate 48 microorganisms, the most frequent Escherichia coli BLEE (+) (2.7%). The 100% of the microorganisms were susceptible to amikacin, meropenem (97.2%), ciprofloxacin, cefepime and ceftazidime (94.4%). The highest resistance was presented with ampicillin/sulbactam (37.1%) for Gram-negative organisms.Conclusions: To evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility in peritoneal fluid isolations in surgical procedures in pediatrics is a good clinical practice that is oriented in the surgeon in the adequate selection of an antibiotic scheme, the risk of early therapeutic failure and the possibility of greater resistance or complications infectious (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Antibacterianos , Pediatria , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...